|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Circumstantial Evidence
399
|
Posted - 2017.04.11 18:18:06 -
[1] - Quote
Ripard Teg wrote:And it's implied in your posts, but not explicitly stated: will the faction Fortizars be destroyable as current Fortizars are? If so, does this mean that over time and eventually, there will be zero faction Fortizars with no replacements possible? Team Five-0 wrote:For the first week after the transition event these new faction Citadels will be invulnerable to allow their owners to set their preferred vulnerability schedule. I think its pretty clear ;) Vulnerable, therefore destructible, non-replaceable Faction citadels with a unique model... how many will go straight to un-anchoring after the transition? I read some stuff about a lack of CCP content for the summer, but the way this is being set up ... capsuleer "content" may fill the void. On transition day, what large nullsec organization will be named on the most landmarks? (In space they have no interest in holding?) |
Circumstantial Evidence
399
|
Posted - 2017.04.11 19:10:05 -
[2] - Quote
Atum' Ra wrote:I'm sorry, but I don't understand in what these faction citadels are better that other citadels??? Re-read post #2.
- The GÇ£ImmenseaGÇ¥ Conquerable Station replacement Citadels will gain extra defensive benefits, hitpoints and slots
|
Circumstantial Evidence
399
|
Posted - 2017.04.11 21:13:31 -
[3] - Quote
Alia Nadasdy wrote:C-J6MT belonged to the Red Alliance for a very long time. And you here so want to delete this story? Do not worry! During the fanfest presentation, they said important events, major battles - would be recorded.
- ...a monument describing some of the historical significance of that particular system and station...
The final owner's name will be a small note. (Watch https://www.twitch.tv/videos/133986045 - 5:54:30) CCP will ask, in months ahead, for events to write on the landmark.
Frostys Virpio wrote:...they could still make the point where your ship model "spawn" when you undock outside of the tethering range. I don't think they will but it's definitely not impossible. Check the "Faction Citadel Image" link in post #2. The dotted circle is not shown in full, but seems to center on the new Citadel. I expect they will be just as "safe" for undock tethering as other Citadels. |
Circumstantial Evidence
399
|
Posted - 2017.04.13 01:10:03 -
[4] - Quote
Valkorsia wrote:... It took years. And in a few short months, Fozzie will make sure it's destroyed by literally painting a bullseye on our backs. I doubt it will be "destroyed," the people that want to live there will continue doing so, but if the forums-predicted storm arrives.... in smaller citadels. Providence remains a formidable, tiring grind if the goal is to take and hold every outpost prior to the transition (assuming profit motive: attacking line members: is all the work to enrich your leadership, worth it?) Perhaps new strategies and allies will emerge; some outposts may be spared for easier targets elsewhere - the problem is not unique to Providence. |
Circumstantial Evidence
401
|
Posted - 2017.04.15 17:22:22 -
[5] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:... any entity is welcome to try and steal our outposts in Delve and I will guarantee it won't be worth the trouble for anyone. Stealing the outposts in Provi is relatively easy and can be done with minimal losses... Buying popcorn now. Who will want this high concentration of easy pickings more... The Imperium, NC/PL, others?
|
|
|
|